The Patna High Court dismissed a miscellaneous appeal in the absence of the appellants, concluding that they were not interested in prosecuting the matter after missing previous hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MA No.118 of 2015 (3) dt.30-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.118 of 2015
======================================================
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
The Union of India through the General Manager, N.E. Railway, Gorakhpur.
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amit Singh
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER
3 30-08-2017 No one turned up on behalf of the appellants again to advance their argument in the appeal. The learned counsel for the respondent is present.
From the perusal of record, it appears that the appellants also did not put their appearance in the case on the last occasion. Thus it transpires that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)
rohit/-
U
Chano Rai, S/o late Baldeo Rai
Manta Devi, W/o Sri Chano Rai
The Union of India through the General Manager, N.E. Railway, Gorakhpur
Prakasha Chandar Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
