Dismissed
Narayan Singh v. the State Bank of India and Ors.
Patna HCFA/115/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This is a thin order dismissing the first appeal for non-payment of court fee.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court FA No.115 of 2009 (4) dt.08-04-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.115 of 2009
======================================================
Narayan Singh .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State Bank of India & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shashi Nath Jha Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
04 08.04.2017 In spite of order of the court, deficit court fee has not been deposited.
Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed due to noncompliance of the order of the court.
shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
U
Narayan Singh
The State Bank of India & Ors
HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court