The High Court at Patna disposed of a writ petition by declining to entertain it in extraordinary writ jurisdiction, citing the availability of an equally efficacious alternative statutory remedy to the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9285 of 2017
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Abbas Haidar-SC-6
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.9285 of 2017 (2) dt.12-07-2017
2/2
to entertain the present writ petition in extra-ordinary writ
jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Kanchan/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise writ jurisdiction when an equally efficacious alternative statutory remedy is available to the petitioner.
Vashi Ahmad
Suresh Pandit
Shiv Kumar Prasad
Ram Jatan Paswan
Balmiki Prasad Kashyap
Chandra Sekhar Prasad Singh
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
