Disposed

Dinesh Narain Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC15 May 2017CWJC/6214/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition directing the provisional release of the seized vehicle to the petitioner subject to filing a certified copy of the order, furnishing a security bond, and providing an undertaking not to alienate the vehicle.

What did the court decide?

Provisional release of the seized vehicle (BR-32C-5091) upon filing a certified copy of the order, furnishing a security bond, and undertaking not to alienate the vehicle.

Dinesh Narain Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Property and Title | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6214 of 2017

¶3

=========================================================== Dinesh Narain Thakur, son of Triveni Narain Thakur, resident of Mohalla Ward No.09, Airport, Basuara, Town + P.S. and District Madhubani

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Madhubani 3. The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani 4. The Officer in charge, Harlakhi Police Station, District Madhubani

¶7

.... .... Respondent/s

¶8

===========================================================

¶9

Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Dr. Anil Kr. Upadhyaya, SC-2

¶11

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶12

and

¶13

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 15-05-2017

¶14

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it is seen that confiscation proceedings with regard to the vehicle in question bearing registration No. BR-32C-5091 is pending consideration before the competent authority in Excise Prohibition Confiscation Case No.601 of 2016-17 and based on the show cause notice issued petitioner has raised various objections, but the Respondent No.2, the District Magistrate, Madhubani is yet to decide on the confiscation proceedings.

¶15

However, it is to be taken note of that in various cases, this Court pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings has directed for release of the vehicles in question provisionally subject to

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.6214 of 2017 dt.15-05-2017

¶17

2/2

¶18

certain directions and that being so, there is no reason as to why pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings the vehicle in question be not directed to be released to the petitioner.

¶19

Accordingly, on the petitioner filing a certified copy of this order along with an application for release of the vehicle in question and furnish security bond to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Madhubani and further undertaking not to alienate the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding and further to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the District Magistrate, the vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner.

¶20

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶21

(Rajendra Menon, CJ)

¶22

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶23

Narendra/-

¶24

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R. CAV DATE N.A. Uploading Date18.05.2017 Transmission Date

Dinesh Narain Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Narain Thakur v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mina Sah Vs The State Bank Of India and Ors.

Kalawati Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manaur Alam Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Mahboob Alam Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nand Kishore Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.