Disposed

Gita Mahila Uthhan Samiti v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC8 May 2017CWJC/5921/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In connected writ petitions sought for payment for work done by petitioners primarily at the behest of the State Government via the Bihar State Housing Board. The Court directed petitioners to file representations impleading the Principal Secretary. The Managing Director was directed to consider the claims and decide within three months from the date of filing representations, after which the peti

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to file representations impleading the Principal Secretary. Respondent directed to decide within three months from filing of representations.

Gita Mahila Uthhan Samiti Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1994 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Satyendra Kumar Son of - Bharsoa Sharma Managing Director of AIM of People (An NGO), resident of Mohalla- Madhav Nagar, Street No. 4 Kako Road Jehanabad, Police Station- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Bihar State Housing Board through the Managing Director having office at Sardar Patel Marg, Patna. 2. The Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, having office at Sardar Patel Marg, Patna. 3. The Chief Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board, having office at Sardar Patel Marg, Patna.

¶7

.... .... Respondents

¶8

======================================================

¶9

With

¶10

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5921 of 2017

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Gita Mahila Uthhan Samiti, being represented through its Secretary, Mani Kumar Pandey, son of Sri Benkatesh Pandey, resident of Rajendra Nagar, Ara, Bhojpur

¶13

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶14

Versus

¶15

The State of Bihar represented through Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Development and Housing, Government of Bihar, Patna,

¶16

The Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, 6 Sardar Patel Marg, Patna – 800 015,

¶17

The Chief Manager, Bihar State Housing Board, 6 Sardar Patel Marg, Patna – 800 015,

¶18

The Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board, 6 Sardar Patel Marg, Patna – 800 015,

¶19

.... .... Respondents

¶20

====================================================== Appearance: (In CWJC No.1994 of 2017) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. A.K. Ojha and Mr. Ashok Kumar Karna, Advocates. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha. For the BSHB: Mr. Ansuman Singh, Advocate. 9 (In CWJC No.5921 of 2017) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avinash Kumar and Mr. Krishna Chandra, Advocates. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajiv Roy, GP 1 For the BSHB: Mr. Rabindra Priyadarshi, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.1994 of 2017 (4) dt.08-05-2017

¶22

2/2

¶23

4 08-05-2017 In both these cases, common issue has been raised for making payment for the work done by these petitioners. For that they have filed representations before the Bihar State Housing Board but primarily the work was initiated at the behest of the State Government.

¶24

The counsel appearing for the Bihar State Housing Board submits that the Principal Secretary of Urban Development and Housing Board be added as a party in whose presence it will be a proper consideration of the claim of the petitioners.

¶25

In such view of the matter, the petitioners are directed to file their representations impleading the Principal Secretary of Urban Development and Housing Board as a party and to serve copy of the representations on the Principal Secretary of Urban Development and Housing Board. The Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board is directed to consider the case of the petitioners and take a decision within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representations.

¶26

With the aforesaid observations, this writ petitions stand disposed of.

¶27

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶28

Dilip, AR U

Gita Mahila Uthhan Samiti v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gita Mahila Uthhan Samiti v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Ram Chhabila Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramendra Nath Tiwary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ranvijay Narayan Singh Vs The Managing Director, North Bihar Power Distribution Company and Ors.

Satyendra Kumar Vs The Bihar State Housing Board and Ors.

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The Union Of India and Ors.