Oral order correcting an clerical error in a previous order regarding petitioner No. 1 by substituting the reference to another Writ Civil Judicial Case.
Order No. 02 dated 08.02.2017 was modified to correct a clerical error in the case reference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 583 of 2017
==============================================
.... .... Petitioners.
Versus
==============================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Avinash Kumar, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra- SC 16
============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER
03. 13.02.2017
So far as the petitioner no. 1, Kailashpati Yadav is concerned, it appears that the order dated 08.02.2017 suffers from error as in place of CWJC No. 391 of 2017 disposed of on 08.02.2017, CWJC No. 11011 of 2016 and other analogous matters has been recorded and matter has been directed to be posted before the appropriate Bench.
Patna High Court CWJC No.583 of 2017 (3) dt.13-02-2017
2
Accordingly, the first paragraph stands substituted by the following paragraph:-
“So far as the petitioner no. 1, Kailashpati Yadav is concerned, this writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 08.02.2017 passed in CWJC No. 391 of 2017.”
The order no. 02 dated 08.02.2017 stands modified to
the aforesaid extent.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.)
Vikash/-
U
Kailashpati Yadav
The State of Bihar
Ravi Ranjan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
