Allowed

Siyawar Pd.Singh v. Patna Municipal Corpn.and Ors.

Patna HC9 Feb 2017CWJC/3949/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging withholding of increments and non-payment during suspension without holding departmental enquiry. Court found violation of natural justice and allowed petition, setting aside order and remitting to authority.

What did the court decide?

Annexure-1 set aside. Matter remitted to Municipal Commissioner to proceed in accordance with law and pass order within three months.

Siyawar Pd.Singh Vs Patna Municipal Corpn.and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3949 of 2009

¶2

====================================================== Siyawar Pd.Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Patna Municipal Corpn.& Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy Mr. Vijay Kr.Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kr.Singh Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 09-02-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appeared on behalf of the Patna Municipal Corporation.

¶4

The petitioner seeks quashing of order, as contained in Memo No. 1653 dated 02.08.2008 (Annexure-1), by which the Additional Municipal Commissioner, Establishment withheld two increments with non-cumulative effect and did not pass any order regarding the payment during the suspension period.

¶5

The relevant facts for disposal of this writ petition are that the petitioner was working on the post of Assistant in the Establishment Section of Patna Municipal Corporation. The petitioner was suspended, vide order dated 12.03.2008 as contained in Memo No. 531/Estt., for disobedience of the order of the Municipal Commissioner. The petitioner was asked to submit show-cause. The petitioner filed his show-cause but thereafter without holding departmental proceeding Annexure-1 was issued on 02.08.2008 withholding two increments of

¶6

Patna High Court CWJC No.3949 of 2009 (2) dt.09-02-2017

¶7

2/2

¶8

the petitioner.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that of course, the punishment appears to be of minor nature, but no departmental enquiry was held. Even the payment during the suspension period of the petitioner was not made and the petitioner was not given any consequential benefit of Assured Career Progression.

¶10

On perusal of the record, I find that the Additional Municipal Commissioner without holding any departmental enquiry withheld two increments of the petitioner with non-cumulative effect, and at the same time did not pass any order with regard to payment of salary and other allowances during the suspension period. The order appears to be violative of principle of natural justice as no departmental enquiry was held, not the petitioner was found guilty.

¶11

Accordingly, in my considered view, the order is not sustainable and thus, Annexure-1 is set aside. The matter is remitted to the Municipal Commissioner to proceed in accordance with law and pass order within three months from the date of receipt of this order.

¶12

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed.

¶13

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.)

¶14

Rakhi U

Siyawar Pd.Singh v. Patna Municipal Corpn.and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siyawar Pd.Singh v. Patna Municipal Corpn.and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Kumar Trigunayat Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Chandra Ram Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Roshan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Umesh Prasad Singh and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Harish Kumar Singh Vs the Bihar State Coopt.Mkt.Uni

Raj Kishore Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.