In a civil writ petition, the High Court of Patna dismissed the application as infructuous on the ground that the petitioner's grievance had already been redressed by the respondents, making no substantive relief necessary.
None; application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3916 of 2014
======================================================
Renu Kumari, daughter of Satyadev Sah, wife of Indrdeo Sah, resident of Village- Kahatarwa, P.S- Sheohar, District- Sheohar.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Kaushal Kr.Jha, A.A.G. 14.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed by the respondents. No further substantive relief is required to be granted to the petitioner.
Considering the submission made on behalf of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.3916 of 2014 (5) dt.22-11-2017
2/2
petitioner, the present writ application has been become infructuous.
Hence, the present writ application is dismissed as
being infructuous.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U
Renu Kumari
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna
The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, Sheohar
The District Education Officer-Cum- District Programme Officer, Sheohar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
