Coram corrected the typographical errors in Order No.2 dated 05.12.2017 regarding the year mentioned in a paragraph and the designation of the fifth respondent.
No specific relief details available as the order only seeks to correct previous typographical errors.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3368 of 2017
======================================================
Arbind Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Shilpa Singh-Ga12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 22-12-2017 This case has been listed under the heading “To Be
Mentioned” for correction of typographical error.
At page no.1, in para 2 of order no.2, dated 05.12.2017 “March 2017” has wrongly been mentioned in place of “March 2014”. Furthermore, at page no.2, in para 2 “respondent no.5 District Education Officer (Secondary Education), Jamui” has wrongly been mentioned in place of “ respondent no.5 District Programme Officer (Secondary Education), Jamui”
Let the order no.2, dated 05.12.2017 be read accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Uday/-
U
Arbind Kumar
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
