Disposed

Bhairow Singh v. Jai Prakash University and Ors.

Patna HC29 Nov 2017CWJC/21262/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ application, the petitioner sought regularization of service and wages. The Patna High Court held that pending representations required action by the Registrar, Jai Prakash University, and directed the Registrar to dispose of them within three months before disposing of the writ application.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No.2 to dispose of petitioner's representations dated 22.08.2014, 13.09.2014 and 13.10.2014 within three months.

Bhairow Singh Vs Jai Prakash University and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21262 of 2014

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Bhairow Singh son of Late Mahabir Singh, resident of village and P.O. Hakam, P.S. Mohammadpur, District Gopalganj

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

Jai Prakash University, Chapra through its Vice Chancellor

¶7

The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, P.O.+P.S.+District Chapra

¶8

The Hon’ble Chancellor, Governor Secretariat, Raj Bhawan, Bihar, Patna

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate For J.P. University/s : Mr. Nagendra Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Anjani Kumar, Sr. Advocate ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 29-11-2017 Heard the parties.

¶13

The following relief has been sought for on behalf of the petitioner in the present writ application.

¶14

‘1. That the present petition is being preferred for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions by issuing the writ of mandamus to the concerned authorities for proper consideration to his claim for regularization of his service on the basis of long continuation against respective post and payment of due entitlement as wages for the period already been worked and for the other necessary relief/reliefs to the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case as an enumerated and started hereinafter.’

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.21262 of 2014(2) dt.29-11-2017 2/2

¶16

Considering the relief sought for on behalf of the petitioner in the present writ application, as also, representations being pending, the Respondent No.2 i.e. The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, P.O.+P.S.+District Chapra is directed to dispose of the representations of the petitioner dated 22.08.2014, 13.09.2014, 13.10.2014 (Annexure-6 series to the present writ application), in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of this order.

¶17

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.

¶18

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶19

Narendra/-

¶20

Bhairow Singh v. Jai Prakash University and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhairow Singh v. Jai Prakash University and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmavir and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dayakant Trivedi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ravindra Das Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.