Disposed

Pramila Kumari v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC3 Nov 2017CWJC/21093/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court adjudicated a writ application seeking salary arrears, earn leave, and enforcement of an enquiry report. The court directed the petitioner to file a representation with the Regional Deputy Director to obtain a reasoned order within three months, disposing of the current proceedings. Salaries and leave were not issued directly.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file representation; Respondent to pass reasoned order within three months.

Pramila Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21093 of 2011

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pramila Kumari Wife Of Sri Vivekanand Sharma Resident Of MohallaSatsang Nagar, Road No.1, Lane No.2, P.S. & District Jehanabad.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Secondary Education, Human Resources Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Commisisoner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

¶10

The Regional Deputy Director (education), Magadh Division, Gaya.

¶11

The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Gaya.

¶12

The District Education Officer, Gaya.

¶13

The In-Charge Area Education Officer, Sherghati In The District Of Gaya.

¶14

The In-Charge Headmaster, Project Girls High School, Tetua Under Atari Block In The District Of Gaya.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

======================================================

¶17

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Lalan Kumar, AC to GP-9

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

7 03-11-2017 Heard the parties.

¶22

In the present writ application, the following reliefs have

¶23

been sought for on behalf of the petitioner :

¶24

(I) To direct the respondents to take action in pursuance to enquiry report vide Letter No.80 dated 25.3.2010 submitted by the Area Education Officer, Sherghati (respondent no.8) to the Commissioner,

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.21093 of 2011(7) dt.03-11-2017 2/3

¶26

Magadh Division, Gaya with respect to complaint made by the petitioner against staffs and teachers including the Incharge Headmaster of Project Girls High School, Tetua.

¶27

(II) Also to direct the respondents to make payment of arrears of salary to the petitioner for the period mentioned below:

¶28

(a) From 21.10.2009 to 25.10.2009

¶29

(b) From 26.12.2009 to 12.2.2010

¶30

¶31

(III) Also to direct the respondents to sanction earn leave to the petitioner for the period 17.6.2009 to 6.7.2009.

¶32

(IV) Also to make payment arrears of salary for that period as during the period the petitioner applied to grant of earn leave for her appearance in B.Ed. Examination held from 17.6.2009 to 6.7.2009 under Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

¶33

Considering the reliefs sought for on behalf of the petitioner in the present writ application, the petitioner is directed to file a representation before the Respondent No.5 i.e. The Regional Deputy Director (Education), Magadh Division, Gaya. The Respondent No.5 shall consider the representation of the petitioner and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation by the petitioner.

¶34

Patna High Court CWJC No.21093 of 2011(7) dt.03-11-2017 3/3

¶35

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present

¶36

writ application stands disposed of.

¶37

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶38

Narendra/-

¶39

Pramila Kumari v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramila Kumari v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nand Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Nitish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Pranav Kumar Pankaj Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Smt.Ram Kumari and Ors. Vs State of Bihar and Ors.

Abdul Halim Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Rajendra Tiwari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.