Disposed

Gramin Vikas, Jan Kalyan Sanstha, Gangoi v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Patna HC1 May 2017CWJC/20325/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner claimed unpaid dues for running Child Labour Special Schools (2007-2010). Court directed Commissioner, Saran Division, to conduct an administrative enquiry regarding the existence and operation of the schools and decide payment within five months hereafter. Application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Matter referred to Commissioner, Saran Division for enquiry into school existence and running (2007-2010); to pass payment order within five months.

Gramin Vikas, Jan Kalyan Sanstha, Gangoi Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20325 of 2016

¶2

===========================================================

¶3

Gramin Vikas, Jan Kalyan Sanstha, Gangoi through it Secretary Rakesh Kumar Singh, S/o Sri Baidnath Singh, R/o village - Gangoi, P.O. Shamkoriya, P.S. Isuapur, Distt. - Saran

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

1. The Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi

¶7

The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Labour Resources Department, Bihar, Patna

¶8

The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra 4. The Assistant Director, District Social Security Koshang Saran, Chapra 5. The Block Development officer, Isuapur, Saran 6. The Project Director NSLP, Chapra, Saran 7. The Mahila Extension Officer, Isuapur, Saran

¶9

.... .... Respondent/s

¶10

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Adv. For Union of India : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, ASG For the State : Mr. Raghwanand, G.A.-11 ===========================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-05-2017

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for

¶13

the State.

¶14

In this case, the petitioner is claiming that he is entitled to an undisputed amount of Rs. 13,16,580/- whereas he has been paid a meager amount of Rs. 2,58,000/-.

¶15

An advertisement was published on 09.03.2007 for conducting the special school for Child Labour under Saran District. The petitioner has also filed an application for the same and fortunately he was picked up and, accordingly, the petitioner entered into an agreement on 28.09.2007, whereafter, the petitioner was

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.20325 of 2016 dt.01-05-2017

¶17

¶18

running the two Child Labour special schools namely Child Labour Special School, Rasulpur and Child Labour Special School, Katsah. The inspection was conducted from time to time. The petitioner has submitted that he has run the school from 2007 to 2010 and is entitled for Rs. 15,74,578/- whereas he has been paid only Rs. 2,58,000/-.

¶19

Let the matter be referred to the Commissioner of the Saran Division who will examine and conduct enquiry into the matter about the existence of the Child Labour Special School, Rasulpur and Child Labour Special School, Katsah and its running for the period 2007 to 2010. If it is found true that the petitioner has run the schools, the Commissioner, Saran Division will pass an appropriate order for payment of the said amount to the petitioner.

¶20

Let the Commissioner, Saran Division, should examine the matter and take a decision within a period of five months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶21

With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of.

¶22

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶23

Rishi/-

¶24

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAVDATE	NA
UploadingDate	03.05.2017
Transmission Date	NA

Gramin Vikas, Jan Kalyan Sanstha, Gangoi v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gramin Vikas, Jan Kalyan Sanstha, Gangoi v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bablu Kumar Chaudhary Vs The Managing Direcrtor, Axis Bank Of India and Ors.

Vikash Kumar Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Kamal Kishore Yadav Vs Central Bank Of India and Ors.

Praveen Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raja Ram Bharti Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Santosh Kumar Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.