Disposed

Ashutosh Partheshwar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC1 Aug 2017CWJC/16859/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of this civil writ petition, directing the petitioners to file a fresh representation within four weeks to the Vice Chancellor of Magadh University. The respondents were directed to dispose of the representation within two months, with consequential action to follow if favored.

What did the court decide?

Direction to file fresh representation within four weeks; direction to respondents to decide within two months.

Ashutosh Partheshwar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar… — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16859 of 2016

¶3

===========================================================

¶4

Ashutosh Partheshwar, Son of Ramanuj Singh, Bagawati Colony, P.S.- Town Thana, District- Vaishali.

¶5

Tanvir Ahsan Nizami, Son of Nizamuddin Ahmad, Resident of Khatoon Manzil, Lalbagh, Mahendru, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna.

¶6

Shakeel Ahmed Khan, Son of Md. Abrarul Haque Khan 101, Halim Heritage, Sabjibagh, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna.

¶7

Shakil Ahmad, Son of Md. Khalil Resident of Shah Gaddi Masjid, North Harding Road, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna.

¶8

Md. Rabban Ali, Son of Md. Usman Ali, Resident of Mohalla- Dadar Mandi, Near Badi Masjid, Patna City, P.S.- Khajekalan, District- Patna.

¶9

Hena Hussain, Daughter of Md. Shamshad Hussain, Resident of MohallaProfessor Colony, Singhi House, Tripolia, Patna, P.S.- Alamganj, DistrictPatna.

¶10

Md. Iqbaluzaffar, Son of Md. Salauddin Ahmad Resident of MohallaPhulwarisharif, B 101, Royal Metipolise Nausa, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, DistrictPatna.

¶11

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶12

Versus

¶13

The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶14

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.

¶15

The Director, Higher Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.

¶16

The Chancellor of the University, Raj Bhawan, Patna.

¶17

Magadh University through its Registrar.

¶18

The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

¶19

The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

¶20

The Oriental College, Patna City through its Secretary.

¶21

The Secretary, Oriental College, Patna City, Patna.

¶22

The Principal, Oriental College, Patna City, Patna.

¶23

The University Grants Commission through its Secretary, Bahadur Shah Zaffar Marg, New Delhi.

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.16859 of 2016 dt.01-08-2017

¶25

2/3

¶26

The Chairman, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zaffar Marg, New Delhi.

¶27

The Secretary, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zaffar Marg, New Delhi.

¶28

.... .... Respondent/s

¶29

===================== Appearance :	====	==================================
For the Petitioner/s	:	Mr. Yugal Kishore, Sr. Advocate
		Mr. Ugranath Malik,
		Mr. Virendra Prasad, Mr. Sanjay Kumar and
		Ms. Nutan Sahay, Advocates
For the State	:	Mr. Virendra Kumar, A.C. to S.C. 13
For the Magadh University ===================== CORAM: HONOURABLE	: ==== MR. O	Mr. Dr. Kumar Amitesh Chandra, Advocate ================================== JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH RAL JUDGMENT

¶30

Date: 01-08-2017

¶31

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶32

After some arguments, learned counsel for the

¶33

petitioners submitted that the writ petition be disposed off with a direction to Magadh University to take a final decision on the representation filed by the petitioners, copies of which have been made Annexures-10 and 11 of the writ application.

¶34

Having considered the matter, the writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the petitioners that, if so desired, they may file fresh representation before the Vice Chancellor of Magadh University within four weeks from today

¶35

Patna High Court CWJC No.16859 of 2016 dt.01-08-2017

¶36

3/3

¶37

along with a copy of this order with regard to the subject matter of the present writ application. They shall be at liberty to raise all points available to them in their representation. The same shall be considered and disposed off within two months from the date of filing of such representation.

¶38

It goes without saying that if the representations are finally disposed off in favour of the petitioners, consequential follow up action shall also be taken within the next two months.

¶39

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶40

Anand Kr.

¶41

AFR/NAFR U

Ashutosh Partheshwar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashutosh Partheshwar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Managing Committee Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Akil Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ravindra Nath Singh Vs The Union Of India Through Secretary Department Of Railway, Railway Bhawan, New Delhi and Ors.

Tazammul Hussain Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Priyanka Bhardwaj and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Ajazul Haque Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.