Oral order dismissing the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on consecutive dates. No reasons were given for the decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16262 of 2008
====================================================== Bharat Prasad Singh S/o Shri Sarayu Singh
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. (AAG3)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
6 06-02-2017 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner even today. The learned counsel for the State is present.
None had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 31.01.2017 as well as on 03.02.2017.
It appears that the petitioner has lost his interest in pursuing the case.
This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non prosecution.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
BKS/-
U
Bharat Prasad Singh
The State of Bihar & Ors
PRABHAT KUMAR JHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
