Petitioners sought direction for engagement in teaching and non-teaching posts under the Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya scheme. The Court held that the nature of appointment did not warrant invoking Article 226 and disposed of the writ application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15086 of 2014
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
2 20-11-2017 Heard the parties.
In the present writ application, the petitioners have sought
for direction for engagement of the petitioners against the
Patna High Court CWJC No.15086 of 2014(2) dt.20-11-2017 2/2
teaching and non-teaching posts on contractual basis under the scheme of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan under the Institution, which is known as Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya.
Considering the nature of appointment, this Court is not inclined to invoke the power under Article 226 of the Constitution.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Narendra/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court can exercise power under Article 226 to direct engagement of petitioners in teaching and non-teaching posts under Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya scheme.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudha Kumari & others
The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Primary Education
The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar
The Director, Bihar Education Project Council
The District Magistrate, Begusarai
The District Education Officer, Begusarai
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
