The High Court of Patna disposed of a writ application as infructuous on the submission that the relief sought had already been redressed by the respondents.
The writ application stands disposed of as being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13512 of 2014
======================================================
Sadhu Sharan Prasad son of Shri Kameshwar Prasad resident of village - Dasturpur, P.O. Dharampur, P.S. Tharthari, District – Nalanda.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Kundan Bhadur Singh, S.C. 22.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 13-11-2017 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the relief sought for by the petitioner in the present writ application has already been redressed by the respondents and the present writ application has become infructuous.
The present writ application stands disposed of as being infructuous.
U.K./U
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Sadhu Sharan Prasad
State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Director Research & Training, Bihar, Patna
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
