The writ application was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on two separate hearing dates despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13453 of 2012
======================================================
Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Gupta, S/O Gauri Shankar Gupta, Resident Of Village- Kamaldah, Post- Kamaldah Bathnaha, Distt- Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondents : Mr. Shyam Kishor Sharma Ga3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
4 07-11-2017 None appears for the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State is present.
On 08.08.2017, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, no one appears for the petitioner.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that the order under challenge is passed by the District Appellate Authority, Sitamarhi. The statutory remedy of the petitioner lies before the State Appellate Authority.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13453 of 2012 (4) dt.07-11-2017
2/2
Considering the fact that on 08.08.2017 none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner and today also no one appears for the petitioner, the present writ application is dismissed for nonprosecution.
U.K./U
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Gupta
The State Of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
