Disposed

Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC24 Aug 2017CWJC/12174/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge disposed of a writ petition alleging encroachment on a public road by respondents. The Court directed the petitioner to file a detailed complaint before the statutory authority under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, after which the authority must remove the encroachment within six months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file detailed complaint with statutory authority; authority to remove encroachment within six months.

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12174 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Rajesh Kumar, Son of Late Charitra Prasad, Resident of Village-Taliwpur, Ward No. 14, P.S. Barh, District Patna.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The District Magistrate, Patna.

¶8

The Superintending of Police, Patna.

¶9

The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Barh, Patna.

¶10

The Sub. Divisional Magistrate, Barh, Patna.

¶11

The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Barh, Patna.

¶12

The Officer-in-Charge, Barh Police Station, District Patna.

¶13

Ashok Saw

¶14

Sunil Saw

¶15

Both Sons of late Shiwalak Saw, Resident of Village-Taliwpur, Ward No. 14, P.S. Barh, District Patna.

¶16

.... .... Respondent/s

¶17

====================================================== Appearance :

¶18

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay, GA 5

¶19

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶22

2 24-08-2017 Inter alia contending that there is an encroachment

¶23

by respondent nos. 8 and 9 on a public road by constructing Chabutara and in spite of complaint made by the petitioner under the People Grievance Redressal Forum, Barh, no action has been taken, the writ petition has been filed. That being so, the petitioner should file a detailed complaint along with a copy of this order before the statutory authority under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act and on the same being done, the statutory authority should proceed to remove the encroachment within a

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.12174 of 2017 (2) dt.24-08-2017

¶25

2/2

¶26

period of six months.

¶27

With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of.

¶28

(Rajendra Menon, CJ)

¶29

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶30

Uday/-

¶31

Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Arti Kumari @ Arati Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Radhe Shyam Thakur

Kumar Shiv Shankar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sambhu Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manoj Mahan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramautar Pandit Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.