Disposed

Hareram Paul v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC6 Nov 2017CWJC/11811/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this PIL, the petitioner sought payment of agricultural compensation funds released by the State Government. The Court disposed of the application, holding that based on the Circle Officer's inquiry report confirming no crop damage, the funds need not be distributed in this PIL and affected individuals must approach competent authorities individually.

What the court decided

AI extract

Hareram Paul Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11811 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Hareram Paul son of Sri Rasoo Paul Resident of village - Sonama, P.S. Garhapura, District - Begusarai.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Disaster Management Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

¶8

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Begusarai.

¶9

The Sub-Divisional Officer Bakhari, District - Begusarai.

¶10

The District Agriculture Officer, Begusarai.

¶11

The Block Agriculture Officer, Garhpura, District - Begusarai.

¶12

The Circle Officer, Garhpura, District - Begusarai.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pratap Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. LALIT KISHORE-AG ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶16

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶17

Date : 06-11-2017

¶18

In this Public Interest Litigation filed by the petitioner, a prayer is made that payment of compensation to the farmers in Garhapura Block under district- Begusarai should be made on the basis of funds released by the State Government to the concerned authorities on account of loss caused to the farmers. It is stated that fund has been released in the form of Agricultural Input Subsidy.

¶19

On notice being issued, the State Government, in the Department concerned, has filed a detailed affidavit and a perusal of the affidavit goes to show that after the funds were received by

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.11811 of 2017 dt.06-11-2017 2/2

¶21

the office concerned, the Circle Officer of the area in question, i.e. Circle Officer, Garhapura, conducted a spot inquiry into the matter, met the farmers, caused an enquiry and submitted a report that no damage to Rabi crop by natural calamity has been caused in the area and, therefore, funds need not be distributed.

¶22

Once such a report has been brought on record, in a Public Interest Litigation no further indulgence can be made.

¶23

If any person is affected by the natural calamity and has not received the compensation, he may take up the issue with the competent authority and it would be for the authority to examine the individual claim and grant the benefit in accordance with law. In a Public Interest Litigation now based on the enquiry report that has come on record, no indulgence can be made.

¶24

With the aforesaid liberty the application is disposed

¶25

of.

¶26

(Rajendra Menon, CJ)

¶27

( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶28

K.C.Jha/-

¶29

AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 8.11.2017 Transmission Date

Hareram Paul v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Hareram Paul v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Asha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rakhika Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chhote Lal Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kumar Anjan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shila Sinha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kishori Das Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.