In this writ petition regarding deficit court fees for land purchase, no party appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite adjournments. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11326 of 2016
======================================================
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
For the Respondents : Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG V with Mr. Alok Ranjan, AC to AAG V
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
No body appears on behalf of the petitioner.
4 23-11-2017
The learned counsel for the State is present.
On 14.09.2017 and 10.10.2017 the case was adjourned at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner to file reply to the counter affidavit.
The case relates to submission of deficit Court fees as the petitioner purchased the land showing different nature of land and less valuation.
Since, no body has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution .
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
SA/-
U √
Sarvotam Kumar Vidayarthi
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Registration, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Inspector General, Registration, Government of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram
The Assistant Inspector General, Registration, Patna Division, Patna
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
