Single judge orally dismissed the writ application filed under writ jurisdiction as infructuous upon counsel's submission. No substantive legal reasoning provided.
Dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1126 of 2012
======================================================
Renu Kumari W/O Pramod Kumar Chaudhary R/O Village & P.O.- Mauna Mahima, P.S.-Goraul, Distt.- Vaishali
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
Considering the said submission, the present
application stands dismissed as being infructuous.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Narendra/-
U
Renu Kumari W/O Pramod Kumar Chaudhary
The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Vaishat
The District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority
The District Education Superintendent, Vaishali
The Block Education Officer, Goraul (Vaishali)
The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayt Enayatnagar, Goraul (Vaishali)
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
