The court held the writ application not maintainable in Patna HC as no part of the cause of action arose in Bihar. The application was disposed of on this ground.
The writ application was not maintainable and was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11151 of 2014
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Union of India : Mr. Anshuman Singh, C.G.C
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
6 13-04-2017 Since no part of cause of action has arisen in the State of Bihar, the instant writ application filed by the petitioner is not maintainable before this Court.
Hence, the writ application is disposed of as not
maintainable.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Md.S./-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application filed by the petitioner is maintainable in this Court given that no part of the cause of action has arisen in the State of Bihar.
Brahma Nand Pandey
The Union of India
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
