The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, submitting it had become infructuous as he was appointed on compassionate grounds. The court allowed the prayer and disposed of the petition.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11121 of 2008
======================================================
Umesh Kumar Yadav
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Namrata Mishra Mr. Nitya Nand Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr. (GP3)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
3 07-02-2017 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition as the petitioner has already been appointed on compassionate ground and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Prayer is allowed.
This writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of as has become infructuous.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
BKS/-
U
Umesh Kumar Yadav
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
