No body appeared for the petitioner. The court, though counsels for the State and one respondent were present, dismissed the writ application for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11019 of 2014
======================================================
Awadhesh Kumar Mishra son of Late Siyasharan Mishra, resident of Babuchak Milki, P.O.- Acchua, P.S.- Paliganj, District Patna (Bihar).
.... .... Petitioner/s
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. S.K.Saraf, AC to G.P.-7 For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Dineshwar Tiwary, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for respondent no.4 are present.
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Md.S./-
U T
Awadhesh Kumar Mishra
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar
The Executive Engineer, Drainage and Investigation Division, Purnia
Pramod Kumar Mishra
Sushila Devi
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
