Disposed

Ravindra Yadav @ Gabbar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Patna HC4 Dec 2017CR. WJC/967/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ application filed by a petitioner seeking direction to respondents to provide security and bodyguard due to threats on his life. The court directed respondents to decide on the security arrangement at the earliest and disposed of the matter.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to take appropriate decision regarding petitioner's security at the earliest.

Ravindra Yadav @ Gabbar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors. — Patna HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 967 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- SIWAN

¶4

===========================================================

¶5

Ravindra Yadav @ Gabbar Yadav, Son of Late Jitan Yadav, resident of Village and P.O. - Mahuari, P.S. - Muffasil Siwan, District - Siwan

¶6

.... .... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 2. The Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur Zone, Muzaffarpur.

¶9

The D.I.G. of Police, Saran, Chapra.

¶10

The S.P., Siwan. 5. The D.M.-cum- Collector, Siwan.

¶11

Incharge, Special Security Committee, Siwan

¶12

.... .... Respondents

¶13

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Gauri Shankar, Advocate For the Respondents : Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, A.C. to A.A.G. - 3

¶14

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-12-2017

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶16

The present writ application has been filed for necessary direction to the respondents to provide security and bodyguard to the petitioner considering the threat on the life of the petitioner for the reasons mentioned in the writ application.

¶17

It appears that in the past, two bodyguards were provided to the petitioner by the State-respondents. In the year 2015 one of them was recalled vide Annexure-3. Thereafter, there is no order of recall of the remaining bodyguard. However, the said remaining bodyguard has informed to the petitioner that the authority wants to withdraw him. Thereafter, petitioner filed a representation for consideration of his security matter which was considered by the

¶18

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.967 of 2017 dt.04-12-2017

¶19

2/2

¶20

appropriate committee headed by the Inspector General of Police (Security), Bihar and vide Annexure-B to the counter affidavit which is letter dated 21.06.2017, the Superintendent of Police, Siwan has informed the petitioner to deposit cost of the security and after receipt of a report regarding perception of threat on the petitioner necessary decision would be taken.

¶21

The respondents are directed to take appropriate decision at the earliest.

¶22

With the aforesaid observation, this writ application

¶23

stands disposed of.

¶24

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶25

Kundan/-

¶26

AFR/NAFR	N.A.
CAV DATE	N.A.
UploadingDate	07.12.2017
Transmission
Date	07.12.2017

Ravindra Yadav @ Gabbar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Yadav @ Gabbar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Department Of Home Government Of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Nath Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Home Department, Bihar, Patna and Anr.

Amaldeo Kumar Singh @ Amaldeo Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home police Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Hazari Dhobi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Smart India Marketing Proprietorship Concern Through Its Proprietor Paras Nath Jha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Bihar, Patna