Allowed

Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna and O

Patna HC17 Oct 2017CR. WJC/1870/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ jurisdiction case, the petitioner sought the unsealing of his residential house where foreign liquor bottles were allegedly recovered, citing pending litigation regarding the executive authority's power to seal. The court directed the respondents to unseal the house and hand over possession immediately, subject to the result of the pending L.P.A. Baleshwar Roy case.

What did the court decide?

Directions to the respondents to immediately unseal the petitioner's house and hand over its possession to the petitioner, subject to the result of the pending L.P.A.

Suraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1870 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- PATNA

¶4

===========================================================

¶5

Suraj Kumar, Son of Rajesh Gope, Resident of Mohalla - Pachmi Darwaja in front of Mazzar, P.S. - Alamganj, District - Patna.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Inspector General of Bihar, Prosecution, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The District Collector, Patna.

¶11

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

¶12

The Officer Incharge, Alamganj Police Station, Patna.

¶13

The Assistant Sub-Inspector, Alamganj P.S. Patna.

¶14

.... .... Respondents

¶15

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Kumar Manish, Advocate

¶16

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 17-10-2017

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

60 bottles of foreign liquor each containing 750 ml was, allegedly, recovered from the western room of the ground floor of the house of the petitioner and the room was sealed in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 210 of 2017.

¶19

Prayer is for unsealing of the room as the same is causing inconvenience in use of the residential premise.

¶20

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is

¶21

that the issue whether the Executive Authority have power to confiscate and seal the house seized in connection with the aforesaid case which power, is exercisable only by a Judicial Authority, is sub

¶22

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1870 of 2017 dt.17-10-2017

¶23

2 /3

¶24

judice before a large Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No. 1647 of 2015 ( Baleshwar Roy vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. ). In the circumstances, till the decision of the L.P.A. aforesaid, further proceeding of Alamganj P.S. Case No. 210 of 2017 may kindly be stayed and the house be unsealed by way of interim measure.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on a judgment of this Court in a case of Smt. Manorama Devi @ Manorma Devi vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. (Cr.W.J.C. No. 605 of 2016) relevant part whereof is reproduced hereinbelow:

¶26

“Learned counsel for the petitioner confines to the prayer made in this writ petition to unsealing residential premises of the petitioner, from where allegedly a few bottles of liquor were recovered less than one month after the notification was issued on 05.04.2016.

¶27

Considering the facts and circumstances and considering the various orders that have been passed in various cases, we direct that the premises of the petitioner be unsealed without prejudice to the State in respect of any other matter which would be disposed of in accordance with law.”

¶28

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let

¶29

the respondents, immediately, unseal the house of the petitioner and hand over its possession to the petitioner, subject to the result of L.P.A.

¶30

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1870 of 2017 dt.17-10-2017

¶31

3 /3

¶32

With the aforesaid observation, this application stands

¶33

disposed of.

¶34

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶35

Kundan/-

¶36

AFR/NAFR	N.A.
CAV DATE	N.A.
UploadingDate	18.10.2017
Transmission Date	18.10.2017

Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna and O

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna and O

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary Excise Department Patna and Ors.

Barahama Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Bhavnath Singh Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Home police Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through The District Magistrate, Bhojpur At Ara and Ors.

Gulshan Nathwani Vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Home Department , Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Helal @ Md. Hlal Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna and Or