The writ petition filed by two convicts was declared infructuous as the learned State Counsel informed the Court that the petitioners had been released on 22nd April 2017. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1325 of 2016
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.K. Sharma, AC to AAG-3
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
In view of the above, this writ petition has now been rendered infructuous. It is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous due to release of the petitioners.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
(Sudhir Singh, J)
K.C.jha/U
Devendra Rai
Manish Kumar
State of Bihar
Rajendra Menon
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
