In Criminal Revision No.893 of 2014, the High Court at Patna dismissed the application filed by Imteyaz Khan for default due to the absence of counsel to press the plea on the date of hearing.
Application dismissed for default due to non-appearance of counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.893 of 2014
====================================================== 1. Imteyaz Khan Son of Late Nurul Khan Resident of Village - Jado Pipara, P.S. - Hathua, District - Gopalganj
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemant Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 13-02-2017 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this application. This application stands dismissed for default.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.)
Prabhakar Anand/-
U √ T √
Imteyaz Khan
The State of Bihar
Halima Khatoon
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
