Allowed

Chitranjan Kumar Singh @ Chittaranjan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance, Bihar, Patna

Patna HC20 Mar 2017CR. MISC./9137/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, accused under the Prevention of Corruption Act, sought bail. The court granted bail on a bond with sureties, conditional upon full cooperation with the investigation and trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, conditioned on full cooperation with investigation and trial.

Chitranjan Kumar Singh @ Chittaranjan Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance, Bihar, Patna — Patna HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9137 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -148 Year- 2016 Thana -VIGILANCE District- PATNA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Chitranjan Kumar Singh @ Chittaranjan Kumar Singh, S/o Late Bharat Singh, Resident of Village- Harahiya, P.S.- Siwaipati, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Vigilance, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma(L.O.,I/C.Vigi.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 20-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶10

Petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Sections 7/8/13(2)/13(1)(d) of the P.C. Act.

¶11

According to F.I.R. co-accused Sunil Kumar Dutt, who was Investigating Officer of a case, was trapped while receiving gratification of Rs.5,000/-. Further allegation is that Sunil Kumar Dutt handed over the money to the petitioner, who was standing nearby.

¶12

Submission of the petitioner is that the petitioner

¶13

is neither the government servant nor a relation of Sunil Kumar

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9137 of 2017 (3) dt.20-03-2017

¶15

2/2

¶16

Dutt nor was a driver of the vehicle; rather he has falsely been implicated on suspicion. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

¶17

Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzaffarpur/Successor Court, in connection with Spl. Case No.68 of 2016, arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No.148 of 2016, with condition that petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the Court-below shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail-bonds of the petitioner in this case.

¶18

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶19

Mkr./-

¶20

U T

Chitranjan Kumar Singh @ Chittaranjan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance, Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chitranjan Kumar Singh @ Chittaranjan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance, Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Fudar Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Pintan Yadav @ Pitan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Uday Kumar Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Dayal Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Roy @ Rahul Kr. Ravi @ Lal Vs The State Of Bihar