Allowed

Prashant Chandra v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Mar 2017CR. MISC./8658/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In criminal miscellaneous proceedings against Sections 323, 506, 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act, the court granted provisional bail to the petitioner husband, subject to conciliation efforts and mutual cooperation for amicable settlement.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on provisional bail on furnishing Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties conditioned on amicable settlement.

Prashant Chandra Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 8658 of 2017

¶2

Arising out of P.S. Case No. - 289 Year - 2016 Thana - MALSALAMI District - PATNA

¶3

====================================================== Prashant Chandra, S/o Karyanand Singh, Resident of Village - Ghosrawan, P.S. - Giriyak in the District of Nalanda

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 01-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶6

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 506, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶7

Learned counsel for the informant is appearing. Petitioner is the husband and allegation is under

¶8

Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

The parties are ready for negotiation for restitution of conjugal right. The petitioner has already filed Matrimonial Case No. 210 of 2016 for restitution of conjugal right.

¶10

In the circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on provisional bail on furnishing bail

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8658 of 2017 (2) dt.01-03-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City/successor Court in connection with Malsalami Police Station Case No. 289 of 2016.

¶14

The court below shall call upon both the parties for amicable settlement of their dispute. If the petitioner would not be found co-operative his bail bond shall be cancelled and if he would be co-operative in the conciliation the bail bond shall be confirmed by the court below.

¶15

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶16

Kundan

¶17

U T

Prashant Chandra v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashant Chandra v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Sunder Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Isamasiullah Vs the State of Bihar through the Sperintendent of Police, District Gopalganj and Ors.

Md. Mozibul Rahman and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Birendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Rohit Pandit Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhabilal Mukhiya Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.