Petitioner sought bail in a case involving offences under Sections 489A to 489D of the Indian Penal Code. The court rejected the bail prayer by relying on a previous order dated 28.04.2016, directing the trial court to expedite the trial.
Bail prayer rejected; trial court directed to expedite the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7229 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -529 Year- 2015 Thana -MAJHAULIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)
====================================================== Sheikh Kari @ Ali Ahmad Son of Sheikh Kawal, Resident of VillageTelhua, P.S.- Nautan, District- West Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 489A, 489B, 489C, 489D of the Indian Penal Code.
Again, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail on the grounds mentioned by me in my previous order dated 28.04.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16874 of 2016 and accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 389 of 2016 arising out of Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 529 of 2015 pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge-III, West Champaran, Bettiah stands rejected.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7229 of 2017 (3) dt.12-04-2017
2/2
However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the
trial of the petitioner and conclude the same as early as possible.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
SHAHZAD/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to bail in a case involving offences under Sections 489A, 489B, 489C, and 489D of the Indian Penal Code given the previous denial of bail.
Sheikh Kari @ Ali Ahmad
The State of Bihar
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
