Petitioners sought quashing of the order cancelling their anticipatory bail. The High Court refused interference but disposed the application with liberty to seek bail on surrender.
Application disposed with liberty to the learned court below to consider bail on surrender.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7087 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -164 Year- 2015 Thana -SUGAULI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amrendra Pd.(App)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
The present application has been filed for quashing the order dated 19.1.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge XI, Motihari in Misc. Case No. 61 of 2015 whereby the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners vide order dated 25.6.2015 in ABP No. 1091 of 2015 in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 164 of 2015 registered under sections 341,323,324,307,379 and 504/34 IPC, has been cancelled on the ground that the petitioners, by filing forged injury report, misled the court.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7087 of 2016 (2) dt.22-05-2017
2/2
doctor who prepared the injury report has not been examined.
The impugned order reflects that the learned Additional Sessions Judge, while cancelling the anticipatory bail of the petitioners, tallied the injury report filed on behalf of the petitioners with the injury report on record.
Hence, this court is not inclined to interfere in the matter at this stage. However, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the learned court below to consider the prayer of the petitioners for bail on surrender without being prejudiced by the order of this court.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Anil/-
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to set aside the order cancelling anticipatory bail granted to the petitioners.
Whether the cancellation of anticipatory bail based on forged injury report warrants interference.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mira Devi
Saheb Sah
Nagina Sah
The State of Bihar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
