In an oral order, the Court granted bail to the petitioner accused in a snatching and robbery case involving the IPC Section 394, requiring a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount.
Petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6885 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2016 Thana -BELCHAR DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)
====================================================== Sandeep Rai, S/o Uday Rai, Resident of Village- Awraiya Belwa, P.S.Banu Chhapar (Bettiah Mufassil), District- West Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Indu Kumari Srivastava
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 08-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution story in brief, is that while the informant was returning along with his staff Satyendra Upadhayay from Inarwa to his house at Bettiah, four unknown motorcycle borne criminal snatched away Rs. 13, 500/- from Satyendra Upadhayay and they also snatched a Samsung mobile after assaulting them.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 17.11.2016. The charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6885 of 2017 (2) dt.08-03-2017
2/2
tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. He has not been put on T.I.P. There is no recovery of any incriminating article from the possession of the petitioner.
On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Balthar P.S. Case No. 65 of 2016.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Amit/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be granted bail in the criminal case instituted under Section 394 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep Rai
The State of Bihar
SUDHIR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
