In Criminal Miscellaneous No.6811 of 2017, the Patna High Court granted bail to Pintu Yadav, accused of assault and other IPC offences, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
Let the petitioner be released on bail by furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6811 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -157 Year- 2016 Thana -SONO District- JAMUI
====================================================== Pintu Yadav S/o Shobhi Yadav, Resident of Ghotari, P.S.- Sona, Dist.Jamui.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party : Smt. Indu Bala Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 03-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting on the head of Chandrika Yadav by means of tangi, as a result of which, blood was oozing from his head. It is further alleged that then other co-accused persons having lathi in their hands, assaulted the informant.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 25.12.2016. The charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has got no
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6811 of 2017 (2) dt.03-03-2017
2/2
criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The nature of injury is said to be simple. Hence, no offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioner.
On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1st , Jamui in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 157 of 2016.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Amit/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in the present case pursuant to Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pintu Yadav
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
