The Patna High Court granted bail to Ranjeet Kumar, accused of theft under Section 379 IPC, subject to conditions including furnishing a bail bond, appointing a relative as a surety, and cooperating with investigations.
Petitioner released on bail on condition of furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6554 of 2017 (2) dt.22-02-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6554 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -28 Year- 2016 Thana -NAUGACHHIYA RAIL P.S. District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar, Son of Ram Vilash Gupta, Resident of Village- Fulwariya, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 22-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6554 of 2017 (2) dt.22-02-2017
similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Md. Ibrarul/BT
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of theft under Section 379 IPC.
What conditions should be imposed on the petitioner's bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ranjeet Kumar
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
