Allowed

Harendra Patel v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Dec 2017CR. MISC./58851/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving possession of liquor under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The court noted the lack of prior criminal record and insufficient incriminating evidence against the petitioner at the time of arrest or surrender.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on anticipatory bail, subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within six weeks.

Harendra Patel Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.58851 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -423 Year- 2017 Thana -MUFFASIL DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Harendra Patel, son of Bhola Raut, resident of Village- Ganauli Ward No. 12, Police Station- Bettiah (Muffasil), District- West Champaran at Bettiah.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 12-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶7

counsel for the State.

¶8

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Sections 35, 38, 41 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶9

The prosecution story, in brief, is that 1865 litres of liquor is said to have been recovered.

¶10

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of disclosure made by the villagers before police as per the F.I.R. The name of the villagers who have named the petitioner has not been disclosed by the

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58851 of 2017 (2) dt.12-12-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

prosecution. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 1865 litres of liquor is recovered from the godown, hut and joint house of the accused in an abandoned stage. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of section 100 of the Cr.P.C.

¶14

On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶15

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Bettiah (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.423/2017, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, West Champaran at Bettiah, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶16

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶17

Amit/U T

Harendra Patel v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harendra Patel v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nivas Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Fakhruddin Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Ram Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dharmnath Rai @ Athai Rai @ Athail Rai @ Athai Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Sahani @ Bholta Vs The State Of Bihar

Pradeep Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar