Allowed

Pravin Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Dec 2017CR. MISC./58373/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna, through an oral order, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving Sections 498A, 323, and 504/34 IPC. He is to be released upon arrest within six weeks of the order, subject to furnishing a bond and complying with Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail within six weeks on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Pravin Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.58373 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -271 Year- 2017 Thana -RUPASPUR District- PATNA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pravin Kumar Singh son of Yogendra Singh Resident of Village - Gangoi, Police Station - Isuapur, District - Saran.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nutan Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 08-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶11

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Sections 498(A), 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

¶13

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58373 of 2017 (2) dt.08-12-2017

¶15

2/2

¶16

present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182 .

¶17

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No.271/2017 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Danapur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶20

Amit/-

¶21

U T

Pravin Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pravin Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Renuka Kumari Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Baldev Pd. Vimal and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Dr.Kiran Saksena Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Ataullah Vs The State Of Bihar

Birbal Saw Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pramod Rai @ Pramid Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.