Tamanna v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application arising from an assault case involving multiple IPC sections including attempt to murder, the High Court rejected the prayer for bail at the initial stage, directing the Trial Court to expedite the trial within a year.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for bail rejected; Trial Court directed to conclude trial within one year.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.57893 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -174 Year- 2017 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)
====================================================== 1. Tamanna, Son of Jalil @ Ganaur, Resident of Bawali Mohalla, P.S. Town Hajipur, District- Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
- The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail of the petitioner in custody should be granted at this stage given the heinous nature of the alleged assault with a sword.
Whether the petitioner is directed to expedite the trial.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tamanna
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Arun Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court