Single-judge oral order granting bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving dowry-related offences and cruelty, subject to furnishing bonds and sureties to the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.57217 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2016 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhepura
======================================================
Arvind Yadav S/o Kamleshwari Yadav, R/o Village- Piprahi, P.S.- Ghailardh, District- Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. MANOJ KUMAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 08-12-2017
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 498A, 494/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 25.1.2017 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57217 of 2017(2) dt.08-12-2017 2/2
Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Mahila (Madhepura) P.S. case No.28 of 2016.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Narendra/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in a case involving Sections 498A, 494/34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Md. Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of BiharReferred¶13
Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Arvind Yadav
The State of Bihar
SUDHIR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
