Sunil Manjhi @ Chandal Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Single petitioner seeking bail in a murder case under IPC 1860. The court rejected the bail prayer noting the petitioner was the main assailant, despite allegations in the FIR about character assassination via the FIR. The court directed the trial court to ensure disposal and SP for witness production.
What did the court decide?
The prayer for grant of bail is rejected. Trial court is directed to ensure early disposal of the trial. Superintendent of Police is directed to ensure appearance of witnesses. A copy is sent to the S
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.55337 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2014 Thana- KHIZARSARAI District- Gaya
======================================================
Sunil Manjhi @ Chandal Manjhi, Son of Hari Manjhi, Resident of VillageTelbigha Naumail, P.S. Khizar Sarai, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Sri Anil Kumar Saxena For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Satyendra Prasad, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 17-11-2017
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail is maintainable in a case where the petitioner is the main assailant and a land dispute exists.
Whether directions for the disposal of the trial and appearance of witnesses are requisite.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sunil Manjhi @ Chandal Manjhi
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Rakesh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court