Allowed

Inal Yadav @ Andal Yadav and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Nov 2017CR. MISC./53474/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to five petitioners charged with offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The Court observed that the petitioners are in custody and directed their release on furnishing bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with sureties of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran.

Inal Yadav @ Andal Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.53474 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -243 Year- 2017 Thana -NAUTAN DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Inal Yadav @ Indal Yadav, son of Late Rudal Yadav

¶5

Birendra Yadav, son of Indal Yadav

¶6

Sanjay Yadav, son of Indal Yadav

¶7

Malayam Yadav @ Mulayam Yadav, son of Indal Yadav

¶8

Dara Yadav, son of Indal Yadav

¶9

All resident of Village-Budhwaliya, P.S.-Nautan, District-West Champaran

¶10

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶11

Versus

¶12

The State of Bihar

¶13

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aditya Nath Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri S.M. Rahman

¶16

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶17

3 27-11-2017 Heard the counsels for the parties.

¶18

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 243 of 2017 dated 21.06.2017 instituted for

¶19

the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 384, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶20

The informant has alleged that petitioners were demanding Rs. 50,000/- as extortion for permitting him to undertake the work of filling of soil on the road. On the date of the occurrence, it is alleged that the petitioners, who are family members, forcibly kept the informant under confinement and assaulted him. Only on the timely arrival of the police, the

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53474 of 2017 (3) dt.27-11-2017

¶22

2/2

¶23

informant could be saved.

¶24

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has stated that the allegations are absolutely false. In fact, there was some attempt on the part of the informant to cut the standing crops in the field of one of the petitioners, for which a complaint case was filed and, therefore, the present case has been lodged against the petitioners. The injuries sustained by the informant appear to be simple in nature.

¶25

The petitioners are in custody since 24.07.2017.

¶26

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

¶27

The petitioners, above named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 243 of 2017.

¶28

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶29

Shageer/-

¶30

U T

Inal Yadav @ Andal Yadav and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Inal Yadav @ Andal Yadav and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basant Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Khora and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Akash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Jitendra Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Jawed Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Dev Vs The State Of Bihar