The Patna High Court rejected a bail petition in Cr.Misc. No.51241/2017, holding that the nature of allegations precluding reconsideration of an earlier rejection dated 21.08.2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51241 of 2017 (2) dt.01-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51241 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -195 Year- 2012 Thana -BHAGWAN BAZAR District- SARAN
======================================================
Amritesh Prabhakar, Son of Shiv Mohan Singh, Resident of VillageDharampur, P.S.- Doriganj, District- Saran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri S. Ehteshamuddin, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
2 01-11-2017
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
Considering the nature of allegation there happens to be no occasion for me to reconsider the prayer of the petitioner which stood rejected at an earlier occasion vide order dated 21.08.2014 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.25173 of 2014.
Prayer for bail is rejected.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners' prayer for bail should be allowed or rejected.
Amritesh Prabhakar
The State of Bihar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
