Allowed

Ashok Kumar and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC4 Dec 2017CR. MISC./48468/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to two petitioners facing Vigilance proceedings for cheating and corruption offenses. The court allowed bail pending surrender within six weeks, upon furnishing a bond and satisfying specific conditions regarding evidence tampering and court attendance.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed pending surrender within six weeks, subject to bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each and conditions regarding evidence tampering and attendance.

Ashok Kumar and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Property and Title | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.48468 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2017 Thana -VIGILANCE District- PATNA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ashok Kumar S/o-Tej Narain Singh, R/o Village-Chullahai Chuck, P.S.Rupaspur, District-Patna.

¶5

Akhileshwar Kumar Chaubey, S/o Bidya Sagar Chaubey, Resident of Village-Bhakhwa, P.S.-Sikraul, District-Buxar.

¶6

.... .... Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Sri Narayan Singh Dy Police Superintendent Vigilance, Patna.

¶10

.... .... Opposite Parties

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Tripathy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad

¶12

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶13

6 04-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

¶14

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No.48 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 13(2), 13(1)D of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that with regard to allegation of defalcation made in the written report, the matter was inquired by Executive Engineer, DRDA. He submitted report on 15.3.2016 fixing the respective liability of every accused persons which was subsequently corrected vide Annexure-3. Petitioner no.1 was directed to make payment of 10% of the alleged amount and petitioner no.2 was directed to make

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48468 of 2017 (6) dt.04-12-2017

¶17

2/3

¶18

payment of 20% of the amount for which the liability was fixed. Learned counsel for the petitioners has pointed out paragraphs 7 and 8 of Annexure 1A filed by the Vigilance in the counter affidavit wherein it has been mentioned that petitioner no.1 has already deposited 10% of the amount, amounting to Rs.51,335/and petitioner no.2 has deposited 20% of amount amounting to Rs.1,03,009/-.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, namely above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No.48 of 2017 and Special Case No.38 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Vigilance 1^st Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section438(2) Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and

¶20

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48468 of 2017 (6) dt.04-12-2017

¶21

3/3

¶22

(3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

¶23

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶24

N.H./-

¶25

U T

Ashok Kumar and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abrar Ahmad Vs The State Of Bihar

Indrajeet Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Balwan Bhama Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Bipin Jha Vs The State Of Bihar