Petitioners sought withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous application arguing that the trial had already commenced, rendering the matter infructuous. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.47116 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -279 Year- 2010 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.N. Pandey (App)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER
trial has already in progress in this case, therefore, this matter has become infructuous and wants to withdraw this application.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Arun Kumar, J)
N.H./-
U T
Sonu Kumar
Avinash Sharma
The State of Bihar
Soni Kumari
ARUN KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
