Petitioners in Criminal Miscellaneous Appeal did not appear on two notices despite calls. Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45652 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2014 Thana -MARHAURA District- SARAN
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sharda Kumari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
5 08-11-2017 Earlier also on 15.09.2017 nobody had chosen to appear for the petitioners despite second call. Today also nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners, hence it appears that they have no interest in the present case.
The petition is dismissed on account of non-
prosecution.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
BTiwary/-
U
Sahjaha Begum and Akbar Miya
The State of Bihar and Rabiya Khatoon
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
