Dismissed

Md. Kausar and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC4 May 2017CR. MISC./44540/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Section 482 CrPC application, petitioners opposed their summoning to face trial for offences under IPC and SC/ST Act, alleging false implication and a land dispute. The High Court held the summons valid as the complaint attracted the alleged offences with support from the complainant and witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Application under Section 482 CrPC to quash the impugned order summoning the petitioners is dismissed.

Md. Kausar and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44540 of 2013

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- EASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI)

¶4

===========================================================

¶5

Md. Kausar, Son of Md. Kais, Resident of Village- Turkaulia, Tole Koraiya, P.S.- Turkaulia, District- East Champaran

¶6

Bashir Ahmad, Son of Md. Hassan Ansari, Resident of Village- Jhirwa, Police Station- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj

¶7

.... .... Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

Gopal Hazra Son of Late Dharichhan Hazara, Village- Turkaulia, Tole Koriaya, P.O. and P.S.- Turkaulia, District- East Champaran

¶11

.... .... Opposite Parties

¶12

===========================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate

¶15

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Shankar Das, Spl. P.P.

¶16

===========================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶18

Date: 04-05-2017

¶19

By way of the present application preferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 06.02.2012 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari by which finding a prima facie case to be made out for the offences under Sections 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(ii)(iii)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the petitioners

¶20

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44540 of 2013 dt.04-05-2017

¶21

2 / 2

¶22

have been summoned to face trial.

¶23

It is contended on behalf of the petitioners that they have been falsely implicated in this case with ulterior motive as there exists a land dispute between the parties for which earlier also the complainant has instituted a complaint against the petitioners.

¶24

Be that as it may, regard being had to the fact that since the allegations made in the complaint do attract ingredients of the offence alleged and they have been supported by the complainant in his statement made on solemn affirmation and by the witnesses examined in course of inquiry, the order summoning the petitioners cannot be faulted with. At this stage, the defence of the petitioners cannot be made a ground to stifle a criminal proceeding.

¶25

Accordingly, the application, being devoid of any merit, is dismissed.

¶26

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)

¶27

Sanjeet/-

¶28

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	09.05.2017
Transmission	09.05.2017
Date

Md. Kausar and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Kausar and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Secretary Navyug Vidyalaya and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Urmila Devi Sah @ Urmila Devi and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Solar Alternatives And Associated Programmes Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Rajeev Ranjan Singh @ Raju Yadav @ Rajeev Ranjan Yadav and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

The General Manager Region , Food Corporation Of India Vs The Union Of India and Ors.