Allowed

Raju Sahani @ Raja Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Dec 2017CR. MISC./43497/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to Raju Sahani in a case involving Section 392 IPC allegations of robbery. The petitioner was not named in the FIR, having surfaced only via a co-accused confession, and was otherwise on bail in prior cases.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Raju Sahani @ Raja Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43497 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -73 Year- 2017 Thana -PIPRA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶3

====================================================== Raju Sahani @ Raja Sahani son of Dhruv Sahani, resident of VillageTikuliya Malahi Tola, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Sahani ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶5

4 08-12-2017 Heard the counsel for the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 73 of 2017 dated 19.04.2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

The informant was looted on the point of fire arm and was divested of cash of Rs. 1, 20,000/- and his personal belongings viz. mobile, laptop and recharge coupon worth Rs. 1,25,000/-.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and his name only surfaced on the confession of a co-accused. Under similar circumstances, one Santosh Sahani has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court. The petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2017.

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43497 of 2017 (4) dt.08-12-2017

¶9

2/2

¶10

It has also been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the cases which were lodged against the petitioner earlier to the lodging of the present case, the petitioner is on bail in all of them.

¶11

Regard being had to the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶12

The petitioner, above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 73 of 2017.

¶13

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶14

Shageer/-

¶15

U T

Raju Sahani @ Raja Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Sahani @ Raja Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagu Baitha Vs The State Of Bihar

Aarti Singh @ Aarti Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Neeraj Rai @ Neeraj Kumar Rai @ Sonu Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Chanchal Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Dablu @ Md. Dablu Alam Vs The State Of Bihar