Allowed

Sita Ram and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC6 Oct 2017CR. MISC./43243/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioners following a coordinate bench's earlier order quashing charges against the principal accused, finding insufficient material to substantiate the charges.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of the cognizance order dated 21.11.2011 passed by the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna in RPF PS Case No. 4 of 2011.

Sita Ram and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Patna HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43243 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4 Year- 2011 Thana -PATNA GRP CASE District- PATNA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Sita Ram Son of Late Durga Ram Resident of Village & P.S. - Chandwa, District - Latehar (Jharkhand)

¶4

1. Mukhlal Son of Mannu Resident of Village - Hohar, P.S. & District - Ramgarh (Jharkhand) .... .... Petitioners

¶5

Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Union of India .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vikramdeo Singh Mr. Manoj Kumar Mr. Sada Nand Ray For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶6

3 06-10-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the Opposite parties.

¶7

The petitioners seek quashing of the cognizance order dated 21.11.2011 passed by Railway Judicial Magistrate, Patna in RPF PS Case No. 4 of 2011, whereby cognizance has been taken under Section 3 of the R.P.(U.P.) Act.

¶8

The facts alleged in the FIR is that four persons were found taking away the iron bars of Railway loaded on a tractor and it is suspected that these articles were being taken to Patna for sale.

¶9

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that Sujeet

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43243 of 2014 (3) dt.06-10-2017

¶11

¶12

Kumar Singh, the principal accused in this case, who is the Senior Section Engineer Construction posted at Rajgir was custodian of the iron bars of the Raiway, who earlier moved before this Hon’ble Court for quashing the criminal proceeding against him in this case and considering his case the criminal proceeding against him was quashed by order dated 8.8.2014 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 3030 of 2014.

¶13

Having considered the submissions of both sides and perusal of the records, this Court finds that earlier the quashing application filed by Sujeet Kumar Singh, Senior Section Engineer, Construction of the Railway, one of the accused of this case and also apprehended on the spot along with these two petitioners, was allowed by a coordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 8.8.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3030 of 2014. Similar is the material against these petitioners. Earlier the Court quashed the criminal proceeding of Sujeet Kumar Singh holding that there is no material to substantiate the charges. So the entire criminal proceeding with respect to these two petitioners in RPF PS Case No. 4 of 2011 is hereby quashed.

¶14

The application stands allowed.

¶15

Snkumar/U T

¶16

(Arun Kumar, J.)

Sita Ram and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sita Ram and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faisal Mahboob and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ram Bilash Yadav Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Pooja Kumari and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shubham Thakur @ Shubham Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Prasad Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Manoj Kumar Prasad @ Manoj Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.