Partly allowed

Amit Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Sept 2017CR. MISC./41260/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition arising out of an offence under Section 419 IPC and Section 10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act, the Patna High Court rejected the prayer for petitioner No. 2 who was found at the scene, directing him to surrender. Conversely, bail was allowed for petitioner No. 1, not found at the scene, with specific unconditional bond provisions.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail of Petitioner No. 2 rejected with direction to surrender. Prayer for Petitioner No. 1 allowed with specific bond conditions of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

Amit Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41260 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2015 Thana -ARWAL District- JEHANABAD

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Amit Kumar.

¶5

Nawlesh Kumar, Both Sons of Yugeshwar Yadav, Both Resident of Village- Sura, P.S.- Kurtha, District- Arwal.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Moleshwar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Nirmala Kumari

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

¶13

2 06-09-2017

¶14

The petitioners apprehend arrest in Arwal P.S. Case No. 45 of 2015 instituted for the offence under Section-419 of the Indian Penal Code and Section-10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act, 1981.

¶15

It is alleged in the written report that in place of Amit Kumar, Nawlesh Kumar (petitioner No. 2) was found writing in the examination of intermediate.

¶16

In such circumstances, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner No. 2. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner No. 2 is rejected.

¶17

The petitioner No. 2 is directed to surrender in the court below and seek regular bail, which will be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.

¶18

So far as petitioner No. 1 is concerned; he was not found

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41260 of 2017 (2) dt.06-09-2017

¶20

2/2

¶21

at the place of occurrence.

¶22

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner No. 1 is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner No. 1 named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Arwal P.S. Case No. 45 of 2015 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner No. 1 shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner No. 1 and (3) if petitioner No. 1 tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner No. 1.

¶23

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶24

A.K.V./-

¶25

U T

Amit Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja Gond Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Niraj Paswan @ Niraj Kumar Paswan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Lalan Tiwary Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sarwar Imam @ S. M. Sarwar Imam @ Sarwar Iam @ Dr. Sarwar Imam Vs The State Of Bihar Through The State Cabinet Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Distict, Patna

Raj Kishore Sahu Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Vigilance Investigation Bureau

Ghanshyam Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar