Allowed

Ram Pravesh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Aug 2017CR. MISC./40325/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowing bail application in a murder case where the petitioner remained in custody for 3 1/2 months. The court granted bail subject to conditions prohibiting witness tampering and ensuring court appearance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur.

Ram Pravesh Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40325 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -25 Year- 2017 Thana -TISIAUTA District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Pravesh Sahni Son of Bhela Sahni , R/o Village- Chapata, P.S.Tisiauta, District- Vaishali.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singh(App)

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 25-08-2017 Heard the parties.

¶11

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Tisiauta P.S.Case No.25 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Allegation against the petitioner and other accused

¶13

persons is of assault to the deceased due to which he succumbed to the injuries.

¶14

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that general and omnibus allegation of assault is against the petitioner and other accused persons. The impugned order itself shows that the postmortem report does not disclose case of the death. The petitioner is in custody for about 3 ½ months.

¶15

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40325 of 2017 (2) dt.25-08-2017

¶17

2/2

¶18

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

¶19

circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Tisiauta P.S.case No.25 of 2017.

¶20

With following conditions :

¶21

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

¶22

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

¶23

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

¶24

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶25

chn/-

¶26

U T

Ram Pravesh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Pravesh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Bhuto Vs The State Of Bihar

Subodh Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhirendra Sharma @ Dhiro Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Sujit @ Amit Kumar Chaudhary @ Amit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Narayan Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Iliyas Vs The State Of Bihar